Coontz goes on to describe the ideas for love in marriage in the modern western society. Being in love is not a necessity before marriage and those that believe this also feel that it is acceptable to find intimacy outside the marriage. The radical idea of marrying for love essay critics felt that if women and men were in love before marriage that things would change in marriage.
But, if not for love, what would be the point of marrying someone? If a person was to enter into a marriage on the grounds of financial purposes as their primary reason, what would keep them there if their partner was to go bankrupt or become ill and unable to maintain the same financial stability that they were used to?
Love and marriage are considered to go together for an everlasting and strong relationship in different cultures, therefore it is necessary that people respect the way each culture takes on this issue of love and marriage. If you need more clarifications contact our support staff via the live chat for immediate response.
Married Eskimo couples often believed in the open marriage motto, where the couples would swap husbands and wives to partake in sexual intercourse.
In fact, true love was meant for intimacy outside of the marriage. In Africa the Fulbe people of northern Cameroon do not see love as a legitimate emotion, especially within marriage. Few other societies have incorporated extramarital relationships so successfully into marriage and child-rearing.
Most unhappy marriages in history share common patterns, leaving their tear-stained—and sometimes bloodstained—records across the ages. Combining love, duty, material security, and marriage was not the strain for her that it was for many men and women of that era.
Unlike in the past or in other cultures where husbands could be forced to divorce his wife by his parents if the wife was not behaving as required by the family or if she failed to give birth to a specific child in terms of gender according the Coontz.
Even today, many cultures disapprove of marrying for love. Interestingly, I learned that love is not a necessity in different cultures, and some people just get married and then fall in love later. The Hindu tradition celebrates love and sexuality in marriage, but love and sexual attraction are not considered valid reasons for marriage.
The ideal mate, wrote U. For most cultures marriage was an act that was done as a necessity.
In some parts of the world there is no marital exclusivity that we see in modern Europe and America. But even when past societies did welcome or encourage married love, they kept it on a short leash. The article was very informative to me. In these places, men and women take multiple wives or husbands, or even extra marital sexual partners without the jealousy that would surely arise in modern relationships.
She stated that the Greek philosopher, Plato, believed that love was not an emotion suited for marriage. In a study of societies, anthropologists found that only 48 forbade extramarital sex to both husbands and wives. But he was not as lucky as Anne.
Love was like a punishment instead of the beautiful thing that it really is. Leo Tolstoy once remarked that all happy families are alike, while every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.
Among the Rukuba of Nigeria, a wife can take a lover at the time of her first marriage. The great Roman statesman Cicero exchanged many loving letters with his wife, Terentia, during their thirty-year marriage. In these places multiple partners are acceptable because they benefit the family in providing for children and in sharing responsibility.
They could also require him to take a concubine if his wife did not produce a son. No wonder that for 1, years women in one Chinese province guarded a secret language that they used to commiserate with each other about the griefs of marriage.
Coontz was quite successful in proving her point throughout this essay, and if someone who had never been in love, or had not formed an opinion on valid reasons for getting married was to read this they would most likely agree with her reasoning.
Many cultures still frown on placing love at the center of marriage. Hence, when Coontz the author argues that love is not a necessity in marriage, it may not be true especially with the current world. The Hindu tradition celebrates love and sexuality in marriage, but love and sexual attraction are not considered valid reasons for marriage.
Historically in some instances love was meant only for a mistress or concubine, not a wife or husband. During the twelfth and thirteenth centuries in Europe, adultery was the greatest display of love amongst the aristocrats.
My general expression on this article is that it is informative and interesting since the information provided was of great use to me. In the Bari culture it was common for the women to be with other men even during pregnancy.
In ancient India, falling in love before marriage was seen as a disruptive, almost antisocial act. She reveals that not so long ago the thoughts on love and marriage were very different for many societies and cultures throughout the world.
When a man does it, they call it male privilege. But in some societies the choice to switch partners rests with the woman.The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love Running Head: The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love Summary of: The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love English Mrs.
Charleston February 3, In “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love.”.
Summary of “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” In the essay “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Stephanie Coontz surveys the history of marriage throughout the world, revealing its historical purposes and the philosophies surrounding it.
Summar of “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love, ” by Stephanie Coontz Essay Sample. Author Stephanie Coontz writes about the ideas of love and marriage through out history in the article “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love.”.
In her essay “The Radical idea of Marrying for Love,” Stephanie Coontz expresses her views on the evolution of marriage from its former survival and connection based purpose, to its now personal and emotional fulfillment motives.
Chapter 1 The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love. George Bernard Shaw described marriage as an institution that brings together two people "under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive, and most transient of passions.
Stephanie Coontz’s essay on “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” demonstrates her opinion that the expectations of marriage are unrealistic based .Download